Showing posts with label Advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Advertising. Show all posts

Thursday, June 18, 2020

Marketing Lessons from My Daughter’s Apprenticeship in Styling My Hair




Seven take-outs for #marketing folks when briefing the #advertising #agency arising from my tryst with my teenaged daughter's #apprenticeship in styling my hair due to my #covid-19 #pandemic salon phobia.

Marketing Lessons from My Daughter’s Apprenticeship in Styling My Hair



“OK, you can open your eyes now, Dad”, my daughter intoned.

My salon phobia during the Covid-19 pandemic made me fall prey to my daughter’s suggestion that she would like to have a go at my unruly, Einstein-like mop of hair, and give it some shape. That’s what I remember her saying to me.

The time and date were set. I sat on a four-legged stool with a plastic sheet under to collect the soot-like snowflakes as they dropped to the floor. I mused that we rarely remember to tip the person in the salon who gathers the mass of hair when we are done with the haircut.  

I closed my eyes as my daughter chipped away. I imagined Michelangelo chipping away at the marble until the only thing left was the magnificent sculpture of David. 

Then she stopped. She brushed my hair from side to side. I guess she was giving it some shape. She ran to get the vanity case mirror from the adjoining room. I heard her footsteps retreating and then could barely hear her tip-toeing back to me. Only her giggly and half-frightened words, “OK, you can open your eyes now, Dad”.

I did. I gasped. Not noticeably, I hope.

For the first time ever, my family saw my full forehead. If fact, my wife remarked. “I did know you had such a large forehead.  You know it is a mark of high intelligence.” 

My daughter had cut my hair to the hairline all round. My other kids passed by without commenting. They are too well-bred to show their feelings, untended.   

My novice hair-dresser was insistent on instant feedback on her work of art. I was torn between my Catholic upbringing of always telling the truth and the reality that was reflecting back at me from the mirror. I could not find the words. My best effort to provide feedback led to some cosmic utterances, “umm”, and such.

Here was a child desiring to free her dad from the frizzy mess and pursuing an alternative career proactively, just in case the hoped-for job does not materialize after completing her B.Com.

I did not want her to despair, nor smother her interest in developing alternative skills. Finally, I got the words out. I lied. I said, the styling was not exactly what I had hoped for. But, this ‘army’ look is what I have always desired, but did not have the guts to attempt before this day. So ‘thank you’ for the bold styling.

My daughter is Catholic. She spoke the truth to authority. “Relax Dad. In a day or two or at best a week, your hair will grow back, and you will look great”.

My eldest son came back from work and he saw me, or saw someone sitting on the sofa, and turned on his suave-self to say something in greeting to the strange looking guest. Then reality struck. His words were most devastating. “What happened here, Dad?”. You let Priya cut your hair? What were you thinking?

I wanted to say, what was on my mind, “I was not thinking”.

For an (ad) agency guy solving clients’ most intractable business problems I asked myself why I did not give my daughter a proper brief and set expectations upfront: a single-minded proposition.

“Make sure my remaining hair is at least the width of your finger over which the scissor may do its job.”

Over the dinner table the commiserations and discussions continued and one of my sons asked the apprentice stylist why did she not leave some hair over the forehead instead of cutting to the hairline. Seems such an obvious thing to do, he said.

And, reality hit again. She said, “I have never seen an adult male hair being cut, so how was I to know?” True! True!

When the dust settled on this episode I was stirred by a thought. Do folks in marketing make the same kind of mistakes in engaging and briefing its advertising agency?

1.   From approaching the best in the business, do we cut corners to settle for ‘apprentices’ and still hope to get clutter-bursting, cash-register ringing, outcomes?
2.   Do we take the pains to give a proper brief or hope the service provider will figure things out for themselves, after all, they are the communication experts?
3.   Do we engage with the service provider in the creation process to provide guidance to get the end product right (agile development) or do we wait blissfully for the end product to be presented only to reject it and clarify the brief, post facto?
4.   Do we leap to judgement on first look at the creative work or do we let it sink in to appreciate its boldness and nuances?
5.   Do we find the words when things go wrong to continue to encourage when the original sin is with the marketer for not providing a specific and inspirational brief to achieve the desired outcome, the very first time, and not at the unpaid cost of several iterations?   
6.   Do we partner with our agency seeking mutual growth or treat them as vendors to execute our thinking and blame them when the campaign bombs?
7.   Do we take pride that because of our marketing expertise the communication agency too has grown in lockstep to prominence working on the brand?
My daughter was right. It took just a good night’s rest and a refreshing, warm water bath in the morning, for me to appreciate my daughter’s enthusiastic effort. While she has the talent for hair dressing, I would still like her to finish her B.Com. and expand her scope to lot more challenging assignments.  

Through all of the emotions coursing through my arteries, my daughter unaffected by all that she had wrought, asked me if I would allow her to cut my hair again. All I could muster to say to continue to encourage her in her pursuits was, “Let’s talk about it in three months’ time.”

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Pitching for Gillette, Vodafone, Mercedes, PepsiCo & TAC.

Lessons in Business Development, Sales, Marketing, Strategy, Business, Entrepreneurship & the pursuit of greater glory.
Chances are, you recognized the first four names up there. No marks for that. But, who the hell is TAC?
I was a Trainee then. FOB- not ‘fresh off the boat’, the acronym that my son uses when we adults don’t ‘get it’, but in this case, ‘fresh off B-school’ and just about a week old in Ogilvy [a global, marketing communications company], my first job, in India. All keyed up to take on the big, bad, glamorous world of advertising.
And plomp! drops a new business pitch right onto my lap. For Tutucorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilizers-a company about to launch their sexy, new fertilizer. This was not going to contribute to my glam quotient with my batch mates. I was to be the smallest cog [the gofer] in the big new-business-machine involving the powers-that-be of Ogilvy.
A new, totally unheard of fertilizer called TAC Ammonium Chloride. Google’s great grandfather, search engine AltaVista was still a decade away. But we still had to know more about this unknown fertilizer thingy. And who better to do that, than the gofer? My job was to ferret out every tidbit that existed about NH4Cl, the cool Ammonium Chloride.
Long story short, the Indiana Jones in me discovered a little know fact, not to just us advertising types, but to even many in the client’s office!
Here’s the scoop: The water that irrigates your field [if you ever did get to buy your farm one day & retire] will never wash Ammonium Chloride away. Btw, I also discovered that the big brother competitor ‘Urea’ tended to get washed away- a good 25% of the nutrient from Urea, just got leeched. Not so, with Ammonium Chloride. But wait a moment, did farmers know that? We checked and found that though they were not sure, they were certainly ready to listen and question their twenty-year-old habit of using Urea! And try out the new kid on a small patch. And from there was born, the positioning of ‘The NO WASTE nitrogenous fertilizer” for TAC Ammonium Chloride. And just that strategic thought, won Ogilvy the new business. Every single committee member from the client team sat up and picked Ogilvy.
And I learnt my first lesson- “Be the Google: Know your product inside out”. There is absolutely nothing that equals the power of that intimate, 360-degree understanding of what you are selling, in business. And while you are at it, you got to know your client, your category, your market, your consumer, your competition as well. Because all of that is "Being the Google" on your product.
Overnight, I was a hero! Not only did we win MY(?) first pitch as a rookie, I practically authored the strategy. And got the first client that I ever managed as an Account Executive. Not to mention, I also got the chance to write the first full-page, newspaper sized launch ad as the ghost copywriter [because I could write well in Tamil, the language to reach our target farmers]. And the full-page ad caught the ‘Father of Advertising’ David Ogilvy’s eye, during his first visit to India & his agency and he cast an appreciative nod in my direction. And I died and went to heaven.
Believe me, this is not some exercise in auto-ego-massage. In talking to a consumer about a product’s benefit, advertising teaches you how you need to ‘peel-the-onion’ and go deeper into the consumer’s psyche, to find what he or she will actually, finally, get out of using the product. Which is why ‘a close shave using your razor’ is not just ‘smooth cheeks’ or ‘clean removal of facial hair’, but is about ‘ being the MAN you desire to be’. So likewise, “Being the Google on your product” will not just win the business for you, but may actually take you to greater glory & to heaven’s pearly gates.
TBC……..
Cartoon Courtesy: Oliver Widder; www.geek-and-poke.com http://geekandpoke.typepad.com

https://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140716225844-22019381-pitching-for-gillette-vodafone-mercedes-pepsico-tac?trk=eml-ced-b-art-M-0-7385971880343409257&midToken=AQErd_RC4jhVYw&fromEmail=fromEmail&ut=11Ue0U4X7Jt6k1

Monday, March 10, 2014

Honesty (and Humor) in Advertising: A Conversation with Gerry Graf

Gerry Graf — the mind behind Red Stripe’s long-running Hooray Beer campaign, theKayak brain surgeon and a rather … saucy Ragú campaign — has built a career by creating ads that are at once hilarious and cunningly effective.
Formerly a chief creative officer at Saatchi & Saatchi NY, Graf is now the founder and chief creative officer of Barton F. Graf 9000 (the name is a mashup of sorts, combining the name of Gerry’s father, Barton, with the BFG 9000, a gun in the game Doom). In just a few years, Gerry and his team have assembled an impressive portfolio of multi-platform work for DishFinlandiaWishbone and many others. The company also offers a very literal mobile website.
All of which goes to explain, at least in part, why we’re delighted to announce that Gerry Graf is the newest member of Facebook’s Creative Council — a group of chief creative officers from the world’s biggest ad agencies organized as a sounding board for identifying top priorities for agency creatives in areas like product, measurement and programs. Council members also serve as the judges for our annual Studio Awards.
In a recent conversation with Facebook, Gerry spoke about the role of honesty in his work, and how the humor in his ads is ultimately driven by strategy.
There seems to be a kind of dark undercurrent to a lot of your work. The ads are always entertaining, but they can also be creepy or a little sad.
I think of it as a realistic undertone. Classic marketers always want to portray the world as though everything’s great. My family’s perfect, my life is perfect. But life’s not perfect. I always look at things in a realistic way, and that view can slide toward the dark because reality’s kind of dark.
With Ragú we did a piece of advertising on Facebook about how to feed your evil kid. The traditional logic would be that you couldn’t say something like that — mothers love their kids, so there’s no way you could call their kids evil. But if you ask any parent they'll tell you right away that, yeah, sometimes their kids are evil little monsters. And I guess it’s that aspect of reality that I’m working with a lot of the time.
Why do you use reality in your ads? What about it resonates?
Whenever a company or brand speaks, we’ve all been trained from growing up in front of the TV, to tune out the message. We block out ad speak. Anytime I’m doing an ad I like to think the way humans speak. When you’re talking that way peoples’ defenses are lowered. They know you’re not just totally full of crap.
I sell hard in everything I do. With Little Caesars, I made it clear: the pizza costs five dollars. But I use entertainment to make the ads really funny. And because we’re being honest, it makes people listen to us a little more closely.
It seems like brands don’t always enjoy speaking directly.
I don’t know if it’s that brands don't enjoy speaking directly. I think the frightening part is that people can speak back to you now. In the old broadcast model, brands could just shout at people. If people were upset, it took them at least a week to write a letter or find the time to call and complain. So a lot of brands got used to speaking in ways that weren’t entirely honest. No one was calling them on it.
Now people can respond instantly. It makes for a bit of fear on the part of marketers, and I think everyone is still trying to figure it out. That’s why I think some of the best campaigns on Facebook so far have been really honest. Brands like Newcastle are being honest about their motives, but they’re having fun with the medium at the same time. And that’s fantastic.
What do you think makes successful creative on Facebook?
The best use of Facebook comes from brands with a clear and distinct voice. When a brand knows who it is and understands how it is connected to its consumers and pop culture, that’s when things work best.
How do you tell your teams to approach working on Facebook?
We study what connections, good or bad, we have with people who use our product and play off of that. We always start with simple static pieces of creative — mini Facebook print ads. They seem to be the best way to stand out in someone’s News Feed. We also operate like a newsroom. Each morning we meet and see what is going on in culture, in the news — is there something we can associate our brands with? We also keep a daily watch on comments and shares, to see which execution is getting sticky and try to fuel the fire.
In general, what do you think people want from an ad?
An ad’s a transaction. As an advertiser, you’re saying to people, “Give me your time or your consideration, and I’ll give you something back.” That thing you give might be a coupon, or a piece of information, or it might be a laugh.
How do you think people value what they’re receiving from ads?
Different transactions elicit different levels of loyalty. If you’re offering a coupon through an ad, it may get traction, but the loyalty will be low — people are engaging for the money, not necessarily out of any affinity for your brand. With a laugh, I think the level of loyalty is higher.
Any form of spam will be valued the least. Anything that’s in your face, unwanted. You need to give people a choice as to whether or not they’ll see it. I think that’s why Facebook has a very easy-to-find button highlighting spam. People don’t want to feel hoodwinked for opting into something. They want to feel like it’s a fair transaction.
What are the limits of honesty for brands?
Everything always derives from a larger strategy. Before we do anything creatively, we know what the brand is, what it stands for and what it should be known for. The things we’re honest about are aligned with the key points of the strategy.
With Kayak, we decided Kayak shouldn’t be known for travel, it should be known for search. Everything we did led people down that road. Our ads showed people that Kayak searches quickly, and it searches the way people search. When you have a strategy, it’s a guidepost for what you want to talk about. And then when you talk, you do it in an honest way.
Everyone has a different sense of humor. How do you get your clients to recognize the humor in your ideas?
Before we start with any ideas we decide what we want to communicate. Like I said, everything starts with the strategy. When we’re first meeting with clients the discussion is purely around understanding strategy. Entertainment doesn’t even come up. When it comes time present our ideas, I always start by saying, “Don’t even comment on the execution.” The important question is: Does this communicate what we want it to?
———
Facebook’s annual Studio Awards celebrate the best creative campaigns on Facebook. This year Gerry and his fellow Creative Council members will be evaluating work based on the following criteria:
  • Craft & Execution
  • Scale & Targeting
  • Business Results
Awards submissions are due January 31st, with winners being honored in New York City in April 2014.

Monday, January 9, 2012

Google embraces advertising - for itself


Google, one of the biggest advertising companies in the world, has finally embraced advertising for itself.
The search giant made its first push into advertising with a Super Bowl ad in 2010 about a young couple falling in love. But through last year it began a more focused national television campaign, as well as taking on other efforts, like hosting Google-themed conferences in an effort to represent its online brand in the offline world.
“This past year has really been a remarkable transformation for Google,” said Peter Daboll, chief executive of Ace Metrix, a firm that evaluates TV and video ads.
Though Google is a household name, it needs to tell its story now for a few reasons. It needs new businesses like the Chrome browser and the Google Plus social network to succeed if it is going to find sources of revenue beyond search ads.
The ads are also part of Google’s mission, led by Larry Page, its co-founder and chief executive, to pare down its product offering and make Google products more attractive, intuitive and integrated with one another.
Lorraine Twohill, Google’s vice president for global marketing, would not disclose how much the company had increased its advertising spending, but said there had been a shift in strategy.
“As we got bigger, we had more competition, more products, more messages to consumers, so we needed to do a bit more to communicate what these products are and how you can use them,” she said.
Also as Google comes under attack from antitrust regulators, it can’t hurt to tell heartwarming stories about Google to wide audiences.
“If we don’t make you cry, we fail,” Ms. Twohill said. “It’s about emotion, which is bizarre for a tech company.”
Some viewers may be hard-pressed to keep their eyes dry after watching “Dear Sophie,” Google’s ad for Chrome in which a father sends multimedia messages to his baby daughter, or to hold back a smile watching grandmothers and children dancing to Lady Gaga.
But that is not to say that Google, where data is religion, does not back up sentimental branding efforts with cold, hard data.
Before showing the Super Bowl ad, Google tested a dozen versions on YouTube and chose to broadcast the one that received the most views.
And Google events, which also fall under the marketing division, require immense spreadsheets, like one to choose a location for Google Zeitgeist, its annual conference for wooing its biggest advertisers. The spreadsheet charted 140 hotels from Manhattan to Phoenix, with color-coded tabs and columns for ballroom size, room rates and the number of layovers to fly there.
The winner was Paradise Valley, Ariz., where Google’s event planner, Lorin Pollack, brought the company headquarters’ preschool motif to the desert.
“Google’s an online brand,” Ms. Pollack said. “You can’t experience the brand except for typing keys. It’s a huge responsibility to actually bring that brand to life outside of the computer.”
The lanterns lining the steps at the nighttime parties were Google colors — red, yellow, blue and green — and oversized stuffed ottomans mimicked the office’s beanbags, where engineers sit with laptops perched on their knees. Attendees could climb on the giant tricycle that Google Street View engineers ride to take photos or design their own Androidrobot T-shirts. A vending machine dispensed primary-colored juggling balls, bought by swiping Android cellphones.
Even the tablecloths had to evoke Google, which meant no billowy linen, Ms. Pollack said.
“Google is a very clean, simple brand,” she said. “Linen gets sloppy. It gets dirty; it’s hard to sit under. I take a lot of inspiration from our home page. It’s just simple.”
Like Google’s events, its TV ads are light on details about products’ features. Instead, they are meant to evoke curiosity and emotion, Ms. Twohill said.
The first ads for Chrome, aimed at frequent Web users, were online and discussed the browser’s speed and security. But when it came time to take Chrome mainstream, she said, Google turned to television to reach those “who don’t get out of bed in the morning and think, ‘I’ll get a new browser today.’ ”
Google broke the recent trend of 15-second television ads to tell stories in a minute or two.
An ad for Google Plus shows the arc of a couple’s courtship without spoken words. The man places the woman in a social circle titled “love of my life,” but he starts out in her circle called “creepers.” Over time, though, he graduates to “book club,” “ski house” and eventually “keepers.”
Another, which was broadcast just before Christmas, shows the Muppets in a Google Plus Hangout video chat singing along to Queen and David Bowie. A newspaper ad for Google Plus featured the Dalai Lama joining Desmond Tutu by Hangout after he was denied a visa to visit South Africa.
Google is also advertising its search engine, even though, with two-thirds market share in the United States, it is hardly an unknown brand to anyone.
“I still think it’s important to remind people why Google matters, how it’s had an impact on people’s lives, what life was like before this,” Ms. Twohill said. An added incentive is that Google’s main rival, Microsoft’s Bing, also has a new ad campaign.
One search ad shows a surfer finding the perfect wave, a teenager becoming the youngest person to discover a supernova and a man installing solar panels.
“We’re all searching for a different thing, even if we’re all trying to get to the same endpoint,” a voice says.
Google’s strategy has connected with viewers, Mr. Daboll said, because they would rather view a story than have products pushed at them. Google ads took five of the top 10 spots on Ace Metrix’s list of the most effective TV ads for Web sites last year.
“Google has been so dominant in its usefulness,” he said. “Now they want to make you feel something about search, as opposed to just relying on it as a useful tool.”

Monday, July 4, 2011

Study: Advertising Half as Effective as Previously Thought


That Said, There Are Ways to Reach Your Mass Market

Advertising to mass markets became popular in the U.S. more than a century ago. And for almost that long, researchers have been studying whether and how advertising works. In the past 50 years, researchers have been studying the effectiveness of advertising with sophisticated statistical models.
Recently, I worked with colleagues to objectively look at how advertising works. We analyzed more than 750 estimates of how sales or market share respond to advertising; these studies were published between 1960 and 2008. The estimates spanned a broad sample of brands, product markets, time periods and countries. What have we found from all these studies? Here are some highlights:
SURPRISINGLY, ABOUT HALF OF ALL ADS ARE INEFFECTIVE 
It may be because firms continue campaigns past their period of effectiveness, persist with ineffective ads or just fail to test if their ads work. Given that so many ads are ineffective, the ads that do work are twice as effective.
THE AVERAGE EFFECT OF ADVERTISING IS HALF AS MUCH AS PREVIOUSLY BELIEVED 
1% increase in advertising expenditures leads to a 0.1% increase in sales or market share. A 1984 study suggests that a 10% increase in advertising leads to a 2% increase in sales; in our study, we found only a 1% increase in sales.
THE LONG-TERM EFFECT OF ADVERTISING IS TWICE AS HIGH AS THE SHORT-TERM EFFECT
While this finding suggests waiting until all of the effects of the advertising sink in before investing in new advertising, the reverse is also true. If advertising is ineffective in the short term, it will not be effective in the long term, and there is no need to wait before trying something new.
THE EFFECT OF ADVERTISING HAS DECLINED OVER TIME 
This finding could be due to the growth of new online media for search, review and buying, and the increased tendency for consumers to make decisions at the point of purchase instead of in the living room while glued to the TV.
ADVERTISING IS MORE EFFECTIVE IN RECESSIONS THAN IN EXPANSIONS 
The reason for this effect could be that advertising during the recession is less noisy. Thus, consumers are more likely to notice and respond during a recession than in an expansion. More generally, a contrarian perspective may be worth testing -- advertise when the market does not and cut back when the market does.
TV ADVERTISING IS MORE EFFECTIVE THAN PRINT ADVERTISING 
This finding is likely linked to the fact that TV advertising is newer than traditional print media and connects with consumers in bold, visual ways. An extension of this finding may suggest that in general, newer media work better than older media. However, there were not enough studies of online media in the published sample to test this hypothesis.
MARKET CONTEXT CAN AFFECT ADVERTISING'S IMPACT
Advertising tends to work better for durable goods than for nondurables, for pharma products than for other products, and for new products over mature products.
ADVERTISING EFFECTIVENESS IS GENERALLY HIGHER IN EUROPE THAN NORTH AMERICA
This could be due to over-advertising in North America relative to Europe or due to more clutter in North American relative to Europe. In looking at large, emerging markets, such as China or India, for example, one would probably get higher responsiveness to advertising than in the U.S. In general, newer markets are more responsive to advertising than more mature markets.
ADVERTISING REMAINS A POWERFUL MEANS FOR REACHING CONSUMERS 
Cases abound of how advertising has helped launch new products, created new markets or built great brands. However, a great deal of advertising may be mundane and about half may be just ineffective. Indeed, advertising effectiveness varies a great deal across contexts. The most important piece of advice that comes from this research: Advertisers need to constantly test the effectiveness of their ads in real markets. While all advertisers hope that their ads will be huge winners -- only a few succeed.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Gerard J. Tellis is a professor and director of the Center for Global Innovation at the Marshall School of Business at the University of Southern California. His article, "How Well Does Advertising Work?" written with Raj Sethuraman and Richard Briesch, is published in this month's Journal of Marketing Research.